I’ll tell you why in a minute.

First let’s discuss the New York Times article last week that caused quite a kerfuffle in the children’s publishing world, particularly among children’s book authors and publishers.  The article in question made three points:

  1. Picture Book sales have declined over the past year.
  2. Many parents are pushing children into chapter books sooner (called “reading up”) due to either the parent’s or the child’s belief that picture books are “too easy.”
  3. Publishing houses are now publishing fewer picture books.

Each of these three statements, taken alone, are true.  The problem with the NYT article is that it used these statements to support this erroneous conclusion: “Picture Books are No Longer a Staple for Children.” In other words, picture books are dead; children and parents are leaving them behind to languish while they scoop up chapter books by the dozen.

Even casting aside shoddy journalism (Mother Reader covers this very eloquently here) and the fact that the one parent quoted in the article said her comments were taken out of context, the article struck a lot of nerves.  The fact is, picture book sales have been declining, and that has writers very nervous, wondering if it is part of a natural cycle or a permanent trend.  Because sales are declining, agents and editors are acquiring fewer of them.  Then we all start to wonder how children will be impacted.  Because regardless of what some parents and teachers may think, picture books are essential in teaching children early literacy and reading.  But don’t just take my word for it.

The EarlyWord blog compiled a fantastic list of reasons why picture books are so important.  The folks at Darien Library said, “The picture book is a unique work of art.  Combining text, illustration, and design elements, a good picture book does more than simply tell a good story.  Picture books can teach and engage a child’s understanding of visual literacy (a skill that this new generation of digital natives will absolutely require to be successful in both academia and professional life).” Miss Print talks about quality versus quantity in reading and why picture books are a critical gateway to other books.  She also notes that because picture books are meant to be read aloud, they often have far more sophisticated language than chapter books that children can read themselves at a young age.

The fact is, some parents do push their children into what they perceive as more challenging books sooner than they did before.  But this is not just the “mean” parent that snatches a picture book out of a child’s hand with a reprimand to read something more grown up.  There are very real pressures on parents and teachers to get kids to meet testing goals.  Picture book author Tara Lazar did a great job addressing this issue on her blog.

And yes, publishing houses are acquiring and publishing fewer picture books – right now.  This is do more to the economic realities and uncertainties of the future market than a condemnation of the picture book as a “dead” format.  Mary Kole, an agent with the Andrea Brown Literary Agency, devoted an entire post to the economics of producing picture books.  Short version: it’s not insignificant.

Here’s my two little cents on a few other things that make picture books so special and so necessary:

  • Exposure to poetry.  And I don’t mean just rhyme, although rhyme is hugely important in developing early literacy, word recognition and speech patterns.  Mem Fox put it better in an essay called Reading Magic. “Songs and rhymes provide comforting rhythms…and also expose kids to gorgeous forms of language.  They are a natural extension of the heartbeat of the mother and the rhythmic rocking of a child in loving arms or in a cradle.” However, the best picture books, whether rhyme or prose, have poetic elements.  With so few words, picture books can’t help but draw from poetic form.
  • Exposure to fine art.  If you haven’t perused modern picture books lately, I urge you to go to your nearest library or bookstore and take a look.  What you will find is some of the finest art being produced today, right there on the page and ready for the very youngest of our children to appreciate and learn from.  Philip Nel at Nine Kinds of Pie said it best by calling picture books a “portable art gallery.”
  • Learning comprehension.  Pictures in stories help children learn reading comprehension.  Period.  Last year, I was a leader of the Junior Great Books program in Em’s school.  JGB focuses on developing critical thinking skills among children using literature.  Her first grade teacher then asked me to lead a group of advanced readers in the classroom using the approach.  She said, “They can read the words – even very advanced words – but they don’t necessarily understand what they are reading.”  Being able to read and decipher words is not the same thing as being literate.
  • Story structure.  Picture books have a clearly defined beginning, middle and end that even the youngest kids can identify because the story is short enough for them to remember.  In this way, picture books not only teach kids to read, but also to write!
  • The sweetness at the end of the day.  Truthfully, there is no more profound or compelling way to spend the last few waking minutes with a child at the end of a day than curling up with a picture book.  Yes, my daughter sometimes likes to read a chapter or two of her book on her own, or I read chapter books to her.  But without the pictures we lose the “cuddle factor.”  She can be across the room listening to a chapter book, but we need to be side by side to read a picture book.  As a result, most nights we sit, together with Jay (4) and read favorite picture books.  We all love them equally, which makes them perfect for quality family time.
  • A childhood rite of passage.  There is so much pressure on our kids to grow up so quickly.  I say, let them have all the picture books they want for as long as they want.  One of my favorite things is when I come home from the library with a stack of picture books for research purposes, and Em says, “Oh I LOVE that book!  Mrs. Morris read it to us last year.”  Then it’s all I can do to get it back from her, which is fine by me.

Where, you ask, in all of this is the reason why picture books are worth more than 1000 words?  For one thing, the pictures often tell a deeper story or even a different story than the text.  For another, each word is chosen very carefully in a  picture book.  There is no room for filler or extraneous text – every word is chosen for beauty, humor, emotion, and/or to move the story forward.  Last, but not least, a picture book will get read over and over and over and over again – maybe even 1000 times.  The inspiration they provide to children along the way is worth every word.

Me reading Twas the Night Before Christmas to the kids - an annual Christmas Eve tradition

What are your favorite picture books?  What role did they play in your childhood?  Also, do you know of any other great responses to the NYT article?  I will compile a list here and add to it as I go.

P.S. The NYT article was the topic of last night’s #kidlitchat on Twitter.  Check out the great discussion on the transcript.

P.P.S. I will post links to other articles/posts written in response to the NYT article here as I find them.

Five Reasons Why Children NEED Picture Books – exceptionally well-researched post by author Terry Pierce

The PICTURE: Kids’ Play: In defense of picture books–and other childish things – article in The New Republic by art critic Jed Perl

NY Times missing the point and why indies do rock picture book selling – by indie bookseller Aaron’s Books

Don’t Forget the Beauty of Picture Books by Jenna Hatfield

What I DID find to discuss in the New York Times article... by Carol Rasco, CEO of Reading is Fundamental

Categories: Books, Childhood, Children's Books, Picture Books, Publishing · Tags: , , , ,

Share

Nancy Mercado, executive editor at Roaring Brook Press and a faculty member at Big Sur in the Rockies, said she sometimes receives submissions where the writing is great, the hook is good but the “voiciness” isn’t quite right – at least for her.  I like that – voiciness.  Kind of the writer’s answer to Stephen Colbert’s “truthiness.”  People can sense when it’s off, but they can’t always say why.  Kind of like listening to a recording of your own voice I guess.  Mine always seems to sound like the grownups in the Charlie Brown T.V. specials.  But I digress…

Voice.  We all have one in real life.  As writers, we must find a way to translate that voice to the page.  That voice is the one thing that makes us unique from all other writers.  Polished writing, strong characters, compelling plot, good pacing, satisfying ending – all of those things are important, but without a unique voice to take the reader on that journey, editors and agents are likely to take a pass on that piece.  Furthermore, they want to “hear” your voice from the first line on the first page.  Andrea Brown, president of the Andrea Brown Literary Agency, said there are only so many universal themes in literature.  They’ve all been used – over and over again.  She stressed that there is no such thing as a fresh idea, only a fresh voice.  Elana Roth of the Caren Johnson Literary Agency, tweeted this on #kidlitchat last night: “Hook gets me to request [the manuscript]. Voice gets me to sign it.”

It can be difficult for pre-published writers to project voice because it requires confidence, authority and authenticity, three things that are hard to come by while you’re piling up the rejections.  Trust and patience are also factors, however.  After a while (so I’m told), your voice will make its appearance on the page if you keep writing.

If there is a “dark side” to voice, it is that by its very nature, voice is personal.  Some people will love your voice; some people will hate it.  I think of writers like Cormac McCarthy.  He has a definite, unique, and compelling voice.  Just don’t ask me to read any of his books.  His voice doesn’t “speak” to me.  Does that make him a bad writer?  Uh – obviously not.  It just means that much of success in publishing comes from getting your work to an agent or editor that hears your voice, loves it and wants to share it with the world.  Researching agents’ and editors’ tastes before submitting is essential (that will be the subject of my next post).  However, we must avoid writing in a voice we think editors and agents are looking for because it will lack authenticy and they will recognize that right away.  The best we can do is to find our own voices and be as true to them as possible.  The rest will follow.

So how do we cultivate voice as writers? Writing, writing and more writing.  In the meantime, all writers of every genre should read agent Nathan Bransford‘s brilliant post on voice from last week.  It’s certainly the best I’ve ever read on the subject.  There is great insight in the comments too.

Writing voices are, to put it in Julia Roberts’ words from Pretty Woman, “slippery little suckers.”  Once you find yours, hold on tight!

Categories: Publishing, SCBWI, Writing · Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Share
Powered by WishList Member - Membership Site Software